Thursday, April 05, 2007

Anonymous is a Pedophile

I've got an anonymous Christian troll who is now harassing my blog, and in the comments section of every recent post I make, he brings up the topic of naked children.

It is quite perverse, to say the least. Anonymous will come in here and say things like:

From someone who would rather see children naked I don't think you're in any authority to see who got waxed.

Pray harder? That's better than seeing naked children. Unlike some people.


Now, there is a small problem with his accusations. I never said anything of the sort, and he would be hard pressed to quote me on anything like that. I've already refuted Frank's naked kids claim, and my good friend Olly absolutely blasted these retarded Christians out of the water. Finally, I noted that naked children tend to be found among clergy and Christians, not atheists.

But still, anonymous persists. Why? Because anonymous is projecting. Anonymous constantly thinks about naked kids, and can't wait to take an opportunity at every new post of mine to deflect his own perverse fantasies on to me. This is because anonymous is a Christian, and Christians are used to self-deceit and compartmentalization.

It's obvious by the frequency of anonymous' kiddie trolling that he is obsessed with the topic. Maybe anonymous was molested by his preacher or something. But in any case, anonymous is a Christian pedophile. Wait, isn't that redundant?

I'm also curious as to who this "anonymous" is. Should I force them to at least use a sock puppet account and forbid anonymous commenting on my blog from now on? Who thinks I should require a blogger account for commenting on my blog? Who doesn't?

28 comments:

say no to christ said...

Hey Aaron, what a coincidence as you were posting your new topic, I was posting on the Sam Harris and said about the same thing. Get out of my head Aaron.lol
-------

I don't mind trolls, I actually like psychoanalyzing them. Who knows one might even be helped. Howeve, I wont be holding my breath. lol

Amy

Anonymous said...

The title of your post is your projection. I'll be sure to keep my children away from people like you.

say no to christ said...

Anonymous, I'm really worried about your children.

I hope you are not becoming arroused when they streek through the house naked or when you accidentally walk in on them in the bathroom. Please don't look at their nudity as sexual and I will feel better with them in your care.

Amy

Intergalactic Hussy said...

Xians believe anyone who doesn't accept Christ are "evil". Is that where this is coming from (because that is just lame)? Aren't most pedophiles actually theists?

Anonymous,
There is nothing wrong with thoughtful debate, but if you don't have a point that relates to anything Aaron has ever said, then stop acting like a spammer!

Aaron Kinney said...

I'll be sure to keep my children away from people like you.

Yes, please keep you and your offspring away from me.

But why dont you take it a step further? Why dont you stay away from my blog as well?

Nobody here is buying your bullshit. You and the Walton Krew have already been laughed at and tossed aside by the reality-based community. The only person you are fooling is yourself.

Aaron Kinney said...

Say No To Christ just handed anonymous his ass in the comments of the last post, and since anonymous is spam-trolling his baloney, I wanted to reproduce SNTC's comment here:

Let me help you with your issues about nudity. First off, clothes are not natural for every climate. Second, there are indigenous societies that do not wear clothes and also do not have the issues of rape and child molestation! Rape, child molestation, and over sexualizing nudity are products of patriarchal religious ideologies! I for one would much rather see children running nude freely, then seeing children forced to cover up in heavy restricting clothes for fear of some pervert lusting after them! If you are so worried that someone will find a young underdevloped child sexy, then YOU have some serious projection issues! Not to worry you are not alone, our whole society has been infected with your projection issues due to patriarchal religious indoctrination, unfortunately. And last of all, I really wish you christians would look up the statistics about who is doing all the raping and child molesting in this country(the US)! I[t] certainly isnt the people in nudist colonies, nor the satanists, nor the pagans and nor is it the atheists!

anonymous just got served a QED to the face. LOL!

BlackSun said...

This reminds me of the moron who insisted that televised nudity was worse than suicide bombing.

If this guy keeps up his trolling, I say ban his ass.

Aaron Kinney said...

Yea, but the only way to do so would be to switch the comments to allow only people with blogger.com profiles. At least that would make anonymous use a profile, even if it is a sock puppet.

But I am loathe to do so because I want as many comments as possible and the requirement of a blogger user ID could deter people who would otherwise comment from doing so.

I do have some regular commenters whose input I value that dont have blogger profiles.

Anonymous said...

Banning anonymous comments would certainly be better than sodomizing a syrup-covered Chihuahua in the Church vestry while chanting "Satan is Lord"! Unless you're an athiest.

What's "projection" again?

Anonymous said...

Ha! Ha! Look at Aaron Kinneypoo getting all mad and frustrated. I won't stay away from your blog until you apologize for admitting that you'd rather see children naked than in Burkhas. You are a sicko.

beepbeepitsme said...

It's simple. Once he stops being entertaining, you just ban him.

Aaron Kinney said...

I won't stay away from your blog until you apologize for admitting that you'd rather see children naked than in Burkhas.

Youre begging the question. I never admitted any such thing. What I said was that I would rather live in a nudist colony than in burkhatown.

Do you still beat your wife, anonymous?

Aaron Kinney said...

LOL this one wins the comment of the month award:

Anonymous said...
Banning anonymous comments would certainly be better than sodomizing a syrup-covered Chihuahua in the Church vestry while chanting "Satan is Lord"! Unless you're an athiest.

What's "projection" again?


Delicious, delicious irony :D

Anonymous said...

Youre begging the question. I never admitted any such thing. What I said was that I would rather live in a nudist colony than in burkhatown.

Thus you would rather see children naked than in burkhas. Sorry, Aaron, but you done screwed yourself up.

Here's the logic of Aaron: "I want to live in a town where everybody is naked. But I want to live in a town where not everybody is naked. I'm consistent!"

That's perfect logic coming from a pedophile. Ya sicko!

Aaron Kinney said...

Thus you would rather see children naked than in burkhas.

Not true. I said I would rather live in a nudist colony. I said nothing of children or any other person. I was speaking only of myself and my personal decision based on two extremes.

The problem with you is that you are seeing what you want to see in this, because you are obsessing over naked children.

Now go away anonmyous troll. Im about to change my comments to blogger account only comments. :P

Rational Response Squad Jr. said...

Aaron,

As your friend I would urge you to take this back:

"I said I would rather live in a nudist colony. I said nothing of children or any other person. I was speaking only of myself and my personal decision based on two extremes."

Why should you take this back? Well, if you can change the word "colony" (definition: a group of people) to just only yourself and no one else, then that rascally Christian, Frank Walton, can change his definition of Burkhatown as a town with no women or men and just himself. Thus, there would be no women he can suppress with a Burkha. And we all know that Frank "the fart" Walton is a misogynist. Don't you hate him? I do.

We urge you to be consistent, Aaron. Trust us, it will help you. Just admit that you would rather see children naked than in Burkhas. We will tell as many people as we can about this. We will tell the whole world if you like.

Always,

RRS jr.

Aaron Kinney said...

Youre a sock puppet, RRS jr. Go away.

I wouldnt be surprised if you were also the anonymous guy from earlier, and youre now using the RRS jr. account cause i disabled anonymous comments.

vjack said...

I'll support whatever decision you make regarding comments. I wish I could say I was surprised to see Christians resorting to such tactics.

Krystalline Apostate said...

anonymous is obviously a member of the Rene Guyon Society , ain't that right, Tim O'Hara?
No doubt we'll see this perv busted on 1 of those Dateline episodes where they go after predators.

god hates women said...

Thanks for changing the blog back to free posting, even though there are assholes out there lurking around to call you a child molester. Your posters know better. Shit even the trolls know better, they are just playing immature name calling games to get under your skin.


Anonymous

Projection is when you project YOUR fears and secret desires on your enemies. We all know you have a fear of not beinng able to control yourself around naked kids, but instead of dealing with it properly, you project it on Aaron, who does not fear that he might see a naked child as a sexual object.

I know I do have a degree in psychology even if it is just with dogs, but I'm sure anyone with half a brain can see what you are doing.


Amy

god hates women said...

My bad, I thought you did. I didn't realize that I still have an account that I never used.lol I still have not figured out how to use my blog, but at least now I can find it. lol

Aaron Kinney said...

Hey Amy,

No problem. At least you can post again! Sorry for the hassle.

Meagan said...

"The title of your post is your projection. I'll be sure to keep my children away from people like you."


Anyone who would mate with you, Frankie-baby deserves whatever comes their, or their kids way.

Yeah, I said it.

god hates women said...

Meagan

Nope that is not my projection that is my observation.

Leviticus:

12:2 Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a woman have conceived seed, and born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven days; according to the days of the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean.

12:4 And she shall then continue in the blood of her purifying three and thirty days; she shall touch no hallowed thing, nor come into the sanctuary, until the days of her purifying be fulfilled.

12:5 But if she bear a maid child, then she shall be unclean two weeks, as in her separation: and she shall continue in the blood of her purifying threescore and six days.
12:6 And when the days of her purifying are fulfilled, for a son, or for a daughter, she shall bring a lamb of the first year for a burnt offering, and a young pigeon, or dove,
for a sin offering, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, unto the priest:


And there are many more passages that are just down right insulting to women. You can check them out at
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/women/long.html

Amy

Aaron Kinney said...

I dunno bout God's opinion regarding unclean women. From my experiences, women tend to be cleaner than men.

Unclean for 7 days? Shit! A women who gets dirty will wash immediately and use all kinds of nice smelling soaps and stuff.

Women arent "unclean" because of that baloney, I dont care what the Bible says.

god hates women said...

Yeah we do like to be clean and smell nice. :)

I really resent how the bible portrays women as foul and dirty.

Job
14:1 Man that is born of a woman is of few days and full of trouble.
14:2 He cometh forth like a flower, and is cut down: he fleeth also as a shadow, and continueth not.
14:3 And doth thou open thine eyes upon such an one, and bringest me into judgment with thee?
14:4 Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one.

I also resent the bible for portraying women as gullible, weak, unable to think for herself, naive, needing guidence,meek, needy, and the list goes on and on. This kind of thinking not only affects chistians, it affect our whole society, to include women and some atheists. And nothing could be further from the truth. We are the ones who bring life into this world and that life has evolved to depend on us for an extended period of time. So, nature has provided us with all the instincts we need to lead, teach, protect, provide and nuture our off spring. Men are supposed to be an added bonus to assure our off springs suvival. That is why we evolved to have sex when ever we want instead of seasonal.Men are suppose to help us and support us. Not shame, beat, rape, humiliate, dehumanize and destroy the source of their off spring! Patriarchal religious ideologies disrupt and destroy the natural process. It is NOT natural, it does NOT bennefit our offspring, it cannibalizes them!

Sorry about going off on a rant, I had a run in with some atheists that let their male egos get in the way of reason and when that happens, all you can do is walk away frustrated. Man, dogs are so much more easier to reason with than some humans!

Amy

Aaron Kinney said...

I would like to take this opportunity to say that "Ninjas 4 Jebus" sucks. Everyone knows that pirates pwn ninjas!

Ninjas 4 Jebus said...

I'm sorry you feel that way, Aaron. YOU seem like a fairly nice guy, which only makes the sting worse. Anyway, pirates tend to be Masons, and everyone knows they're secretly running the world for the Beast. So what can ya do?